<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BridgeGap Engineering Blog &#187; innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/tag/innovation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com</link>
	<description>Cement Production &#38; Engineering Community Blog/Forum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No news is&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/no-news-is</link>
		<comments>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/no-news-is#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demosthenes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Business Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bridgegapengineering.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why would you waste time changing that? We never had any complaints!&#8221; An associate was recently relaying a story to me about how he was trying to improve some of the documentation going to the customer when he was hit with these statements.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all heard this and most of us have probably fallen victim to it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why would you waste time changing that? We never had any complaints!&#8221; An associate was recently relaying a story to me about how he was trying to improve some of the documentation going to the customer when he was hit with these statements.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all heard this and most of us have probably fallen victim to it at one time or another. &#8220;No news is good news&#8221;, &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221;, &#8220;No one is complaining so it must be good&#8221; and many other variations. But the truth is quite different. It&#8217;s a funny thing about dissatisfaction, far more often than not, someone who is dissatisfied simply walks away, never to return. Some studies show that as few as 1 in 25 dissatisfied customers will choose to complain. The rest will just lock it away, another black check mark against your brand, and when you collect enough black check marks, you&#8217;ve lost a customer.</p>
<p>In the &#8220;analog&#8221; world, a dissatisfied customer might tell 8-16 others about their dissatisfaction by word of mouth. in the digital world, it could be thousands. And, importantly, 91% of dissatisfied customers will never purchase goods or services from you again! Of course satisfaction does not guarantee loyalty. These are closely related, but different phenomenon. It is not possible to have loyalty without satisfaction, but it is quite possible that satisfied customers will not remain loyal. Satisfaction can best be thought of as a willingness to continue in the relationship, but an openness to the next, better, offer. Loyalty is a willingness to continue in the relationship in the face of competition.</p>
<p>There are dozens (perhaps hundreds) of factors that drive customer loyalty. A common factor among many of them is that they are based on a relationship between the customer and the supplier. This relationship <span style="text-decoration: underline;">may</span> never manifest itself as a dialog between two people, but it almost always does if it is to have truly lasting value. Trust can be built and expectations defined through a simple request-fulfillment loop, but a feeling of engagement comes from someone reaching out to you, being genuinely interested in what you offer, and acting on that interest.</p>
<p>Customers who complain are a gift! Complaints mean the customer is engaged in the relationship. They mean the customer WANTS the relationship to work. If a customer complains and is satisfied with how the complain is handled, they are as much as 10% MORE LOYAL than a customer who has never had any problems. Of course making your customers complain may not be the most desirable way to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">get</span> them engaged, but if they <span style="text-decoration: underline;">are</span> engaged they <span style="text-decoration: underline;">will</span> complain, and you better be prepared to listen and act!</p>
<p>Engagement through involvement in the creative process is a fantastic and positive way to build loyalty, even in a product or service you aren&#8217;t ready to offer. Such is the motive behind the proliferation of &#8220;open beta&#8221; releases by software companies, popularized by Google. &#8220;Here, have a look at what we are working on, kick the tires, let us know what you think.&#8221; This strategy can be wildly successful <em>as long as you listen and act</em>! On the other hand, it might be the worst business decision you ever make if you think it will get you good PR but you don&#8217;t really need to listen to what these early adopters say.</p>
<p>No news is NOT good news. Do not assume your customers are happy, let alone loyal, simply because they do not complain. You need to build relationships with your customers and talk to them even if (especially if) they are not talking to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/no-news-is/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An innovation shortfall?</title>
		<link>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/innovation-shortfall</link>
		<comments>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/innovation-shortfall#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Demosthenes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Business Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bridgegapengineering.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Mandel has an interesting article at BusinessWeek where he speculates that part of the blame for the current economic slump can be placed on a failure to innovate over the last decade. This is somewhat shocking at first, given all the hype innovation has received in the business world and the general press. On the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Mandel has <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_24/b4135000953288.htm?campaign_id=rss_daily">an interesting article</a> at BusinessWeek where he speculates that part of the blame for the current economic slump can be placed on a <em>failure</em> to innovate over the last decade. This is somewhat shocking at first, given all the hype innovation has received in the business world and the general press. On the surface the technological revolution has been greater then the industrial revolution&#8230;until you look at the actual contributions to business and society.</p>
<p>True, technology is moving forward at leaps and bounds and it seems new and promising research is announced daily that will save the environment/cure cancer/prevent bad breath/insert your favorite cause, but much of it has proven devilishly difficult to bring to full realization.</p>
<p>The argument continues that this failure of innovation to deliver on promise caused debt driven growth based on a fantasy vision of the future. I can buy into this pretty easily for biotech, energy, technology and a few other areas, but I&#8217;m still looking for a connection to the cement boom. The argument could be made that cement manufacturing as an overall process has been in the slow lane for a long time. It&#8217;s a low risk kind of business after all. Innovation has been primarily focused on incremental improvements in production, quality, reliability, environmental compliance, and cost. Very few producers are really trying to do anything <em>differently</em>, just better, and the OEM&#8217;s are simply meeting the demands of the market.</p>
<p>Tell us what you think. How did the innovation gap figure into the cement production investment bubble? Should producers be investing in completely new approaches to making cement? &#8230; or is there simply an enormous amount of low hanging fruit readily available in the day-to-day operation of a cement plant &#8211; yet to be tapped? </p>
<p>Trying to decide whether to innovate <em>or </em>survive in tumultuous times? Asking the question misses the point, the only answer is to do both! But how? Over at <a href="http://harvardbusiness.org/">Harvard Business Publishing</a>, they have started to publish a <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/anthony/2009/06/seize_the_silver_lining_a_chec.html?cm_re=homepage-051309-_-body-middle-tert-_-voices">series of articles</a> with some of the key points from a brand new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Silver-Lining-Guide-Innovating-Downturn/dp/1422139018/">The Silver Lining: An innovation Playbook for Uncertain Times</a>. The summaries sound promising and the book is definitely on my near term reading list. Read the articles in the links and download a free copy of the first chapter and it will probably be on yours as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogbridgega.tempwebpage.com/innovation-shortfall/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

